SiteDocs alternative for RAMS
SiteDocs is a safety compliance app with a real foothold in North American construction, and plenty of teams run their RAMS inside it. If you're weighing whether there's a better alternative for building, signing, and filing RAMS, this is an honest look at both.
Trusted by companies, projects and teams of all sizes
The short answer
The SiteDocs alternative for RAMS is Dashpivot by Sitemate. It's worth switching if price increases, subcontractor sign-in friction, or the need to draft RAMS faster are the reasons you're looking. If SiteDocs is working well and the cost is stable, the case is weaker.
What SiteDocs Is Built For
SiteDocs is a purpose-built safety compliance tool for construction. It's designed to get safety checklists completed, signed off, and stored, and it's well established with teams in North America who need a clear audit trail for safety documentation.
- - Safety checklists and sign-off workflows on site
- - Safety documentation storage and compliance records
- - Field-level sign-offs across construction crews
- - Core safety form management for North American construction requirements
Why Teams Look for an Alternative
SiteDocs works for safety forms, but some teams hit friction points that compound over time. The issues that push people to look for an alternative aren't usually about the core safety features. They're about cost, access, and the gap between what they're paying and what's changed.
- - Annual subscription costs that have increased steeply, with buyers reporting large year-on-year jumps and little new functionality to show for it
- - Subcontractor sign-in requires a multi-step email, link, and QR process, which slows down getting crew signed onto a RAMS on site
- - User caps mean growing teams hit access limits, and implementation failures have left some teams without a working setup
- - Support issues, including timezone lag and responses that attribute problems to user devices rather than resolving them
It's 6am, the job starts at seven, and the RAMS is a Word file nobody can find on SharePoint. The client wants it signed and emailed before anyone's on site.
What Dashpivot by Sitemate Is Built For
Dashpivot by Sitemate is a field system for building, running and signing off safety documents like RAMS, then keeping the record. You build the RAMS once, run it on any device, and every version stays filed against the job.
- RAMS and method statements built from a reusable template, not retyped for every job
- Sign-on on site so the crew is recorded against the RAMS they were actually briefed on
- One register of every RAMS, across every job and every subcontractor
AI Form Generation
Describe the form you need in plain language, or upload an existing PDF, Word or Excel document. Storm builds it as a structured digital template with the right fields, sections and workflow attached, and you edit it before you publish.
AI Form Fill
Capture what you see and say, and Storm fills the form for you. The details land in the right fields automatically, so a complete record exists the moment the work is done.
Works on site
Built for gloves, cabs, and screen protectors. Captures inputs offline and processes in the background. No waiting on the field.
You stay in control
Storm never commits a record on its own. Every output is a draft for human review. Admins control what Storm can write to.
How Dashpivot does [the job]
Three steps, and you own the record at the end of all of them. Set the RAMS up once, run and sign it on site, and keep every version filed against the job it belongs to.
-
Step 1
Set the RAMS Up Once
Build your RAMS with the hazards, risk scores, controls and method steps your work needs, or start from a free template and adjust it. It becomes the form every job runs from.
- [Optional. The routes in, one per line, if there is more than one way. Bold the route, then a short qualifier. Delete if there is only one path.]
-
Step 2
Run and Sign It On Site
Fill it on any device, offline if the site has no signal. Storm can draft the first version from the work scope, and the crew signs onto it before the job starts.
- [Optional. What gets captured, one per line. Storm is a line in this list, never the heading.]
-
Step 3
Keep the Signed Record
Every RAMS is filed against its job and date, versioned and audit ready. Export it to PDF, email it to the client, and it stays yours after the job closes.
- [Optional. What the record carries, one per line.]
What Dashpivot Does Not Replace
Dashpivot runs the RAMS process and holds the record. It doesn't decide whether your controls are adequate, and it isn't a legal sign-off. A competent person still reviews the hazards and signs the method as safe for the job in front of them.
What Dashpivot Does for RAMS Today
What ships today, and nothing that doesn't:
- Build RAMS and method statement templates with hazards, risk scoring and controls
- Draft the first version with Storm from the work scope, then edit it
- Sign the crew onto the RAMS on site, on any device, offline
- Keep every RAMS in one register, versioned and audit ready
- Export to PDF and email it to the client or principal contractor
Where Dashpivot Stops
The honest gaps, and we'd rather you know them now:
- Decide whether a control is adequate. A competent person owns that call
- Act as legal or regulatory sign-off on your RAMS
- Replace a dedicated estimating, accounting or design tool
Both digitise safety paperwork and hold the record. The differences that decide it are how RAMS get authored, how subcontractors sign on, and whether one register carries every job.
- Columns: Capability | Dashpivot | SiteDocs
- Structured RAMS and method statement authoring | Yes, from a reusable template | Safety forms, less method-statement focused
- Subcontractor sign-on without seat friction | Yes | User caps and sign-in friction reported
- One register of RAMS across every job and subcontractor | Yes | Yes, within safety
- Storm drafts the first version from the work scope | Yes | No
- New capability at the same price | Ongoing | Steep increases with little new reported
Where the Two Actually Differ
For RAMS specifically, the differences come down to how each tool handles method statement authoring, how subcontractors get signed on, and what you get when the price goes up.
- - Dashpivot by Sitemate supports structured RAMS and method statement authoring from a reusable template, including hazards, risk scoring, and controls. SiteDocs is stronger on safety forms and checklists than on method statement authoring.
- - Storm can draft the first version of a RAMS from the work scope, so you're editing rather than starting from blank. SiteDocs has no equivalent.
- - Subcontractors can sign onto a RAMS in Dashpivot by Sitemate without the email-link-QR chain that SiteDocs requires, and without needing a paid seat.
- - Dashpivot by Sitemate continues adding capability at the same price. SiteDocs buyers have reported large annual increases with little new to show for them.
Where SiteDocs Is the Better Choice
SiteDocs has a genuine track record in North American construction safety compliance. If that's your market and your team is already set up, running well, and not hitting price or access problems, there's a real case for staying.
- - Your team is in North America, already embedded in SiteDocs, and the cost hasn't been an issue
- - Your RAMS work is light and your main need is safety checklist sign-off rather than full method statement authoring
- - You've built your safety workflows around SiteDocs and a migration would cost more than it saves
How Teams Move From SiteDocs
Nobody moves every RAMS at once. You decide whether it's worth it, bring one job across, then widen out once a crew has signed onto a live one.
-
Step 1
Decide
If SiteDocs already covers your safety paperwork and the seat count works for your crews, staying put is reasonable. Move when subcontractor sign-on gets expensive, or when you want your RAMS in the same system as the rest of your field records.
-
Step 2
Convert
Bring one job's RAMS across. Rebuild it as a Dashpivot form, or start from the free RAMS template and add your hazards and method steps. Word and PDF documents can ride along while you switch.
-
Step 3
Pilot
Run it live on one job. The crew signs onto the RAMS on site, and you keep exporting the PDF you send the client, so nothing you depend on switches off while you test it.
-
Step 4
Roll Out
Once one crew has run a live RAMS end to end, add the rest of your jobs and subcontractors. Every RAMS lands in one register, and the visibility gap closes.
Frequently Asked Questions
English (United States) 
English (Australia) 
English (UK) 
English (New Zealand) 
English (South Africa) 
German